Everton and Nottingham Forest face MINIMUM six-point deduction after being charged with ‘breaching FFP rules’

EVERTON and Nottingham Forest face minimum six-point deductions this season after being accused of breaching Premier League financial rules.

After weeks of speculation, League chiefs confirmed the two clubs had been hit with charges for breaking the Profitability and Sustainability Rules last term.

Everton have already been docked ten points for FFP rule breachesReuters

Reuters

Nottingham Forest sit just four points above the Premier League relegation zone[/caption]

And it leaves both sides lined up to be hit with significant points deductions that will reset the relegation scrap and tip the pair of them into the heart of the scramble for survival.

It means Everton, already appealing against the ten-point deduction imposed for breaches in 2021-22, face ANOTHER penalty.

A further six points, in addition to the initial penalty, would plunge the Toffees to 19th in the Prem table, just two points ahead of bottom-placed Sheffield United and five points away from a survival spot.

An Everton statement said: “Everton Football Club acknowledges the Premier League’s decision to refer a breach of Profit & Sustainability rules (PSR) for the assessment period ending with the 2022/23 season to an independent Premier League commission.

“This relates to a period which covers seasons 2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23. It therefore includes financial periods (2019/20, 2020/21 and 2021/22) for which the club has already received a 10-point sanction. The club is currently appealing that sanction.

“The Premier League does not have guidelines which prevent a club being sanctioned for alleged breaches in financial periods which have already been subject to punishment, unlike other governing bodies, including the EFL.

“As a result – and because of the Premier League’s new commitment to deal with such matters ‘in-season’ – the club is in a position where it has had no option but to submit a PSR calculation which remains subject to change, pending the outcome of the appeal.

“The club must now defend another Premier League complaint which includes the very same financial periods for which it has already been sanctioned, before that appeal has even been heard. The Club takes the view that this results from a clear deficiency in the Premier League’s rules.

FREE BETS – BEST BETTING OFFERS & NEW CUSTOMER BONUSES

“Everton can assure its fans that it will continue to defend its position during the ongoing appeal and, should it be required to do so, at any future commission – and that the impact on supporters will be reflected as part of that process.”

Forest would also drop down from 20 points and 15th into the third and final relegation place, two points adrift of Luton in 17th.

A Forest statement said: “Nottingham Forest acknowledges the statement from the Premier League confirming that the club has today been charged with a breach of the league’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules.

“The club intends to continue to cooperate fully with the Premier League on this matter and are confident of a speedy and fair resolution.”

All 20 top-flight clubs had until December 31 to hand over their final accounts for the 2022-23 season.

New League regulations, introduced last summer, meant that today was the deadline for charges to be brought.

Prem rules allow clubs who spend three consecutive seasons in the top flight to make “permitted losses” – after income and expenditure are calculated – of £105m over that period.

Forest, who were in the Championship for the first two seasons being assessed, were restricted to losses of £61m.

The likelihood of a six-point deduction comes from the independent commission hearing that assessed Everton’s earlier case.

The written reasons of the three-man body showed that Prem chief executive Richard Masters, on behalf of the League, argued that the standard starting penalty for a “PSR” breach should be six points, with a further point deducted for each £5m in excess of the allowed limits.

While the commission opted to ignore that request and impose a penalty based on the evidence to hand, their final sentence almost exactly matched the Prem recommendation.

The new fast-track procedure allows both clubs 14 days to respond to the charges.

A hearing must be completed by April 8, allowing any punishment to be imposed before the end of the season.

Clubs can then appeal, with the verdict of a subsequent panel potentially coming after the season has finished but BEFORE next term’s top-flight 20 members are confirmed by their presence at the annual summer meeting in June, when each promoted club takes over the “share” of a relegated side.

Everton, as in the previous case, are likely to try to argue that their books have been wrongly assessed and that any punishment should be mitigated by the club’s efforts to stay within the rules. 

Forest are understood to be arguing that Brennan Johnson’s £47.5m transfer to Spurs, completed on transfer deadline day on September 1, should be allowed into the 2022-23 accounts even though the football financial year ends on June 30.

The Welsh attacker made three Prem appearances for Forest this season before his switch to North London.

THIS IS A DEVELOPING STORY…

The Sun is your go to destination for the best football, boxing and MMA news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video.

Like us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/TheSunFootball and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSunFootball.