‘He behaved like a BABY’ slams Premier League legend as he tears into Arsenal star Bukayo Saka after Bayern draw

8 months ago 76

BUKAYO SAKA was accused of “behaving like a baby” for his ref rant against Bayern Munich.

Coming as it did from such a fiery Premier League legend as Paulo Di Canio, that jibe may be seen as ironic – but it was no less scathing for it.

Bukayo Saka confronts the referee after the final whistle over his penalty decision 👀

📺 @tntsports & @discoveryplusUK pic.twitter.com/0Zj9eFSETq

— Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) April 9, 2024
PA
Bukayo Saka was furious at being denied a late spot-kick[/caption]

The ex-West Ham hero didn’t hold back – slating Saka‘s outburst after the Arsenal winger was denied the chance of a last-gasp penalty winner.

The England ace remonstrated wildly when Swedish referee Glenn Nyberg waved away his appeals.

Fans were divided on whether Saka was in the right as he claimed Bayern keeper Manuel Neuer tripped him.

But the 22-year-old raced up to Nyberg to complain, even pointing to where on his leg he reckoned Neuer had taken him out.

Saka continued his antics seconds later as the final whistle sounded on Tuesday’s 2-2 Champions League quarter-final draw.

And Arsenal assistant boss Albert Stuivenberg had to push the star away – with Saka flapping his arms around in annoyance.

Sky Italy quoted Di Canio as slamming both the penalty appeal AND in particular Saka’s resulting protests.

The former Sunderland chief, 55, said of the spot-kick controversy: “He moves blatantly the leg towards Neuer, it’s never a penalty.”

Surprised it wasn't a penalty, says Halsey

By Mark Halsey

SOME will say that Bukayo Saka initiated the contact, but Manuel Neuer stuck out his leg.

I was surprised Glenn Nyberg did not award Arsenal a penalty in real time at the end.

Bayern Munich could have no complaints if it was given, they got away with one.

Munich were very lucky.

It is subjective, so maybe that is why VAR did not get involved.

Had it been given, the decision would not have changed.

Reuters
Saka even confronted referee Glenn Nyberg after the final whistle[/caption]

And Di Canio put the boot in over Saka’s reaction to not getting his way.

The ex-Juventus and AC Milan attacker insisted: “He didn’t behave as an experienced player.

“He behaved liked a baby with no experience.”

Di Canio might simultaneously be considered the best and worst qualified pundit to judge such tantrums – given his own dodgy track record with match officials.

Most infamously of all, the Italian was banned for 11 games in 1998 for pushing ref Paul Alcock over.

And fans on social media appeared to believe it was slightly cheeky of Di Canio to assess Saka in such a way.

One posted: “Says one of the biggest ‘cry babies'”.

Another simply put: “Coming from Di Canio…”

But a third fan said of the ex-Lazio forward’s verdict: “Tough! But I agree 99%.”

Why would he pick it up? It HAS to be a penalty, says Halsey

By Mark Halsey

Arsenal could have absolutely no complaints if a penalty was awarded to Bayern Munich.

The referee signalled for David Raya to take the goal kick.

He did… and Gabriel picked the ball up. Why would he do that? The whistle had been blown.

The only person who has made a mistake is Gabriel. Why would he pick the ball up?

Once the referee has blown his whistle and Gabriel has picked it up, he has to give a penalty.

Reuters
Gunners’ winger Saka and team-mate Thomas Partey were locked in animated debate following a contentious climax to a dramatic draw[/caption]
Read Entire Article