In the late 1990s, one of the most famous actors on the planet was a pint-sized Chihuahua with a big attitude. Millions of TV viewers watched, amused, as the tiny dog stared down the camera and barked the catchy phrase, "¡Yo quiero Taco Bell!"
The talking Chihuahua quickly became a pop-culture phenomenon – a sassy mascot selling tacos with irresistible charm. The character (portrayed by a dog named Gidget) was voiced by comedian Carlos Alazraqui, who gave the pup a distinctive accent and immortalized that Spanish tagline ("I want Taco Bell" in English). The campaign, launched in 1997, was an instant hit and turned the Taco Bell dog into one of the decade's most recognizable advertising icons.
But behind the adorable mascot and its overnight fame lay a tumultuous behind-the-scenes story – one involving a stolen idea, a years-long lawsuit, and a $42 million payout that no one saw coming.
Kevin Winter/Getty Images
Birth of the "Psycho Chihuahua" Idea
Our tale begins not in a boardroom or film studio, but at a bustling licensing trade show in New York City in June 1996. Taco Bell's licensing manager, Ed Alfaro, was strolling the convention floor when he stumbled upon a cartoon drawing of a bug-eyed Chihuahua bearing the name "Psycho Chihuahua." The character was the creation of two Michigan marketing guys, Joseph Shields and Thomas Rinks, who were eager to find a big brand to license their feisty little dog. Alfaro immediately saw potential in the quirky pup for Taco Bell's advertising. As he gazed at the wide-eyed cartoon canine, he realized this could be a perfect mascot for selling tacos. Shields and Rinks were thrilled at the prospect and entered talks with Taco Bell's team about developing ads around their character.
Through the summer and fall of 1996, Alfaro championed Psycho Chihuahua within Taco Bell's marketing department. He shared the concept with colleagues, generating buzz internally, and even organized a focus group to test various mascot ideas. The result? The crazy little Chihuahua won by a landslide, outshining all other contenders as the public's favorite potential spokes-animal. With such positive feedback, it seemed Taco Bell had struck gold. By late 1996, the fast-food chain was preparing to formalize a licensing deal with Shields and Rinks. The two creators were on the cusp of a big break – their zany Chihuahua was about to go national with a major company.
The Deal That Disappeared
Then, something went very wrong behind the scenes. Just as Shields and Rinks were expecting to sign the official licensing agreement, Taco Bell abruptly backed out of the deal without warning.
Just a few months later, in early 1997, Taco Bell switched to a new advertising agency, TBWA\Chiat\Day, and at a marketing meeting with parent company PepsiCo, they unveiled a very familiar-looking mascot. To the astonishment of those who knew the backstory, Taco Bell forged ahead with a Chihuahua character of its own for an upcoming advertising blitz, including a big Cinco de Mayo promotion.
Upon learning of this development, Ed Alfaro – the very person who'd discovered Psycho Chihuahua – was horrified. He knew immediately that Taco Bell's new mascot was a blatant copy of Shields and Rinks' creation. In fact, Alfaro was so alarmed that he alerted Taco Bell's in-house lawyers, warning that the original creators were "likely to sue because of the similarities between the characters." Nevertheless, the company pushed forward.
Later in 1997, the first Taco Bell Chihuahua commercial hit the airwaves, featuring a real-life dog (Gidget) made to "talk" through special effects and utter cheeky one-liners in a Spanish accent.
A Star Is Born
The Chihuahua campaign took the nation by storm. In commercial after commercial, the tiny dog cleverly delivered lines like "¡Yo quiero Taco Bell!" and "Drop the chalupa!" that soon became catchphrases everybody seemed to know. The mascot appeared in a crossover ad with the 1998 Godzilla movie, was plastered on T-shirts and toys, and even had talking plush dolls repeating its famous slogan. The humor of a small dog demanding fast food struck a chord, turning the campaign into a $500 million marketing triumph for Taco Bell. Kids adored the Chihuahua, adults chuckled at the ads, and the phrase "Yo quiero Taco Bell" firmly entered the late-'90s pop culture lexicon.
Backlash
Yet, as the Chihuahua's fame grew, so did a wave of backlash. Not everyone found the talking-dog shtick amusing. Some Latino advocacy groups lambasted the campaign for promoting crude stereotypes – essentially using a sombrero-wearing, Spanish-accented Chihuahua to symbolize Mexican culture. The commercials that dressed the dog as a bandit with a sombrero or as a beret-wearing revolutionary (à la Che Guevara) drew especially heavy criticism. Mario Obledo, a prominent civil rights leader, called the Chihuahua ads "outrageous, despicable, demeaning and degrading," arguing that equating a dog with an entire ethnic group was plain offensive. He even threatened to boycott Taco Bell if the company didn't retire the mascot.
On top of the cultural criticism, there was a practical problem: by 2000, Taco Bell's sales were slumping. The cute dog might have been a fan favorite, but it wasn't selling enough tacos. In fact, same-store sales dropped 6% in the second quarter of 2000 – the largest decline in the company's history up to that point. Whether due to the backlash, the lackluster sales, or a combination of both, Taco Bell executives decided it was time for a change.
In July 2000, the chain officially ended the Chihuahua ad campaign, terminating its relationship with TBWA and even replacing its president as part of the fallout. After a meteoric rise, the talking Chihuahua was suddenly out of a job. (For the record, contrary to urban legend, the dog didn't die in 2000 – Taco Bell simply changed marketing strategy.) The era of "Yo quiero Taco Bell" had come to an abrupt close. But for the original creators, Shields and Rinks, the fight was just beginning.
Creators Bite Back: The Lawsuit
Imagine watching a character you dreamed up become a national sensation – and not receiving a single dime or credit for it. Joseph Shields and Thomas Rinks found themselves in exactly that position. They filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit against Taco Bell, asserting that the company had improperly used their "Psycho Chihuahua" concept without compensation. What ensued was a long, drawn-out courtroom battle that would last for years. Taco Bell denied wrongdoing, essentially betting that the creators couldn't prove the idea was theirs. But Shields and Rinks were dogged in their pursuit of justice, and the case eventually went to trial.
In 2003, the creators finally had their day of vindication. A jury sided with Shields and Rinks, finding that Taco Bell had indeed breached an implied contract by taking their idea and running off with it. The fast-food giant was ordered to pay a whopping $42 million in damages to the duo. (The award was originally around $30 million, with additional interest bringing it to roughly $42 million by that point.) The verdict made headlines – a David-vs-Goliath victory where two little-known ad men brought a corporate behemoth to heel. To Taco Bell, it was a humiliating and expensive defeat. To Shields and Rinks, it was the sweet taste of a long-awaited triumph – almost as satisfying as a bag full of tacos. But the drama didn't end there.
Taco Bell Tries to Pass the Buck
Taco Bell turned around and sued its own ad agency, TBWA\Chiat\Day, arguing that if the "Psycho Chihuahua" concept was used improperly, it was the agency's fault and, therefore TBWA should foot the bill for the $42 million payout. Essentially, Taco Bell attempted to pass the buck, claiming they had hired TBWA in good faith and that any intellectual property missteps were on the agency. This intra-industry squabble set off another protracted legal fight, one that roped in a new cast of lawyers – including a name that would later become very familiar in Washington, D.C.
Defending TBWA in court was attorney Doug Emhoff – yes, the same Doug Emhoff who would years later become the Second Gentleman of the United States as the husband of Vice President Kamala Harris. Back in the 2000s, Emhoff was an entertainment lawyer tasked with extricating TBWA from Taco Bell's finger-pointing. He and his legal team argued that Taco Bell alone was responsible for its marketing choices and that the agency shouldn't be on the hook for Taco Bell's decision to appropriate the Chihuahua idea. The case culminated in a federal appeals court ruling in 2009, and it wasn't good news for Taco Bell. The judges decided that Taco Bell, not its ad agency, had to bear the cost of the infamous Chihuahua misadventure. In other words, Taco Bell was stuck paying every penny of that $42 million judgment. Emhoff's client TBWA was off the hook, and the decade-long legal saga was finally over. The little dog had its day (in court), and Taco Bell had learned a pricey lesson about idea theft.
Epilogue: Adiós, Chihuahua – End of an Era
Gidget, the Chihuahua who portrayed Taco Bell's mascot, continued to pop up in pop culture even after the commercials were canceled. She made a cameo in a 2002 Geico insurance ad (trading quips with the Geico gecko) and even appeared as Bruiser's mother in the 2003 film Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde. For the rest of the 2000s, Gidget enjoyed a pampered life away from the spotlight. She ultimately passed away in July 2009 at the age of 15, prompting Taco Bell to issue a statement mourning the loss of their famous "top dog." By then, the Taco Bell Chihuahua was already the stuff of advertising legend – a once-inescapable mascot now fondly (if a bit controversially) remembered through YouTube clips and nostalgic references.
Bengali (BD) · 
English (US) ·